May 102013
 

Hippie Dictionary: A Cultural Encyclopedia of the 1960s and 1970s, Revised and Expanded Edition

Hippie Dictionary: A Cultural Encyclopedia of the 1960s and 1970s,  Revised and Expanded Edition

Whether you lived through the sixties and seventies or just wish you had, this revised and expanded edition of the HIPPIE DICTIONARY entertains as much as it educates. Cultural and political listings such as “Age of Aquarius,” “C?©sar Ch?°vez,” and “Black Power Movement,” plus popular phrases like “acid flashback,” “get a grip,” and “are you for real?” will remind you of how revolutionary those 20 years were. Although the hippie era spans two decades beginning with the approval of the birth co

List Price: $ 19.99

Price: $ 10.16

  3 Responses to “Hippie Dictionary: A Cultural Encyclopedia of the 1960s and 1970s, Revised and Expanded Edition”

  1. 48 of 53 people found the following review helpful
    2.0 out of 5 stars
    Good idea – needs work, March 30, 2003
    By 
    D. Huw Richardson “Church Geek” (San Francisco, CA) –
    (REAL NAME)
      

    This review is from: The Hippie Dictionary (Paperback)

    On page 20 I learned that Alechemy was, really, about changing material things (and not spiritual things) but this kind of esotericism might be missed w/o a fascination with religious history.
    On page 26 I learned that Gerald Ford was president in 1970, granting Amnesty to Vietnam Draft Dodgers… (Nixon was President then…)
    On page 32 I learned that the Aryans got their name from Arius of Alexandria (confusing “Arians” and “Aryans”).
    … The content shows a distinct lack of research in several areas. The scope is wide and wonderful and I would have been happy to add this to my trivia collection, but I can’t trust any of it given the amazing errors I’ve found in the first 30 pages.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  2. 35 of 40 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars
    Farther out, June 2, 2004
    By 
    John S. Ryan “Scott Ryan” (Cuyahoga Falls, OH) –
    (REAL NAME)
      

    This review is from: Hippie Dictionary: A Cultural Encyclopedia of the 1960s and 1970s, Revised and Expanded Edition (Paperback)

    I reviewed the first edition of this book on 27 August 2002 (about ten reviews down), so click through if you want to read what I originally wrote. This review is for the second edition.

    Here’s all I’ll say about the content: the revised and expanded edition, just like the first, is an extended argument for keeping The Dream alive. If, like me (and, obviously, John Bassett McCleary), you know there was something more to ‘the Sixties’ than a bunch of kids getting stoned and having sex, then you’ll appreciate this book not only as a reference but as a ‘tickler file’ for your psyche.

    The main thing is, what’s new in _this_ edition? Well, there are about fifty more pages of text. (The official page count has risen from 663 to 704. But the page numbering has also been adjusted: the entries, which used to start on page 12, now start on page 1 and the forematter is numbered with lowercase Roman numerals. By my count that’s an increase of 52 pages.) As you’d expect, some entries are new and others are longer than they used to be.

    But probably the most important thing for you to know is that McCleary and/or his editor (Joan Jeffers McCleary) have gone over the earlier edition carefully and fixed the errors that have been noted in some of the earlier reviews of this book. There was, for example, some extraneous material included in the very first entry (‘A’); now it’s gone. The others — all the ones I know about, anyway — have been corrected.

    The McClearys deserve a big round of applause for the quick turnaround time. (The first edition is only two years old.) In my original review I rather unwillingly deducted maybe half a star for that stuff; it was obviously the result of deadline pressure, but this is still a reference book and factual mistakes count. In this review I’m happy to give the half-star back.

    Everything else I said in my earlier review still applies. As McCleary writes, our society threw the baby out with the bathwater in rejecting hippie ideals; what’s most important here is to recognize the 1960s as a period of _experimentation_. Anybody who wants to devote some thoughtful attention to the results of those experiments will find plenty to think about in this book. There’s a lot here, but there’s nothing you need to ‘believe’ — just take it seriously enough to let it roll it around in your mind for a while.

    With this edition a cool book has gotten cooler. Don’t miss it.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  3. 34 of 40 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars
    Far out, August 27, 2002
    By 
    John S. Ryan “Scott Ryan” (Cuyahoga Falls, OH) –
    (REAL NAME)
      

    This review is from: The Hippie Dictionary (Paperback)

    I originally bought this book to share with my two daughters, who (at my wife’s instigation) have lately taken to calling me “Hippie Dippie Joe.” But it’s so cool that I read and enjoyed it myself.

    John Bassett McCleary has done a nice job on this book. This isn’t just a dictionary or a “hippie glossary”; though it includes lots of words and phrases from the common countercultural parlance of the 1960s and ’70s, it also includes (short) historical and ideological summaries, together with some stuff you wouldn’t expect to find in such a source.

    (Here’s one example: McCleary quite rightly devotes many pages’ worth of attention to the computer/Internet revolution, which probably a lot of people _still_ don’t realize is part of the hippie legacy. McCleary has also starred the entries for the people he regards as most influential — e.g. Dr. King — and the words/phrases that have had the most impact — e.g. “cool.” And there are pages and pages and pages of lists at the back of the book.)

    There are a few glitches that force me to deduct a little bit from his rating. For example, McCleary consistently refers to Henry David Thoreau’s essay “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” as a “book” — and, moreover, claims to have found the phrase “Question Authority” in it. This isn’t a serious problem but there are enough little things like it that I can’t award full points to what is, after all, supposed to be a reliable reference book. On the other hand, most of this stuff is so clearly the result of deadline pressure that I hate to deduct more than half a star, so let’s just say I’m rating it at 4.5 stars.

    McCleary does pretty much everything else just right. I’d like to have seen a bit more about the influence of science fiction on 1960s ideals (and maybe even an entry on SF writer Spider Robinson, whose work deliberately and consistently embodies those ideals). But McCleary does work in some references to SF; indeed his list of relevant period literature includes not one but _two_ novels by Robert A. Heinlein. (He also makes liberal use of the term “grok,” although his spelling of it is inconsistent.)

    And I agree with so many of McCleary’s own evaluations that I wonder whether we’ve been reading each others’ minds. His entries on, e.g., Stephen Gaskin, Willie Nelson, and James Taylor are just right, and his entry on the meaning of “true hippie” is smack on the mark. (And I’m glad he kept his historical summaries short; the book would have swelled to unmanageable size if he’d devoted more than a paragraph or two to each event.)

    In short, this isn’t just a reference; it’s an extended argument for keeping The Dream alive. As McCleary writes under the entry for “true hippie,” if the world had listened to the hippies thirty years ago, 9/11 wouldn’t have happened. (And of course I do mean “the world,” including especially the terrorists themselves.)

    In that spirit — keeping the fire alive, that is — you may want to pick up Skip Stone’s uneven _Hippies A to Z_ as a short companion volume.

    (Note: If you buy this book for your kids to read, be aware that there’s _lots_ of stuff about sex in it. I’m not saying that’s bad, just letting you know. My kids think that stuff is a hoot, but your kids aren’t my kids.)

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

 Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>