Finding Nemo (Five-Disc Ultimate Collector’s Edition: Blu-ray 3D/Blu-ray/DVD + Digital Copy) Reviews
Finding Nemo (Five-Disc Ultimate Collector’s Edition: Blu-ray 3D/Blu-ray/DVD + Digital Copy)
Sea it like never before! For the first time ever, through the magic of Blu-ray and Blu-ray 3D, fully immerse yourself in the stunning underwater world of Disney/Pixar’s FINDING NEMO! From the creators of TOY STORY and MONSTERS, INC., this critically acclaimed and heartwarming tale splashes off the screen with brilliant digital picture, high definition sound and breathtaking interactive 3D bonus features that transport you beyond your imagination. In the depths of the Great Barrier Reef, Marlin
List Price: $ 49.99
Price: $ 30.71
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (Blu-ray 3D/Blu-ray/DVD + UltraViolet Digital Copy Combo Pack)
The adventure follows the journey of title character Bilbo Baggins, who is swept into an epic quest to reclaim the lost Dwarf Kingdom of Erebor from the fearsome dragon Smaug. Approached out of the blue by the wizard Gandalf the Grey, Bilbo finds himself joining a company of thirteen dwarves led by the legendary warrior, Thorin Oakenshield. Their journey will take them into the Wild; through treacherous lands swarming with Goblins and Orcs, deadly Wargs and Sorcerers. Although their goal lies to
List Price: $ 44.95
Price: $ 25.98
Pixar’s getting in a habit of constantly outdoing themselves,
Finding Nemo is the fifth installment for Pixar Studios, the most reliable studio in Hollywood today, and it is my personal favorite. The first obviously outstanding aspect of the movie is the animation. From the breathtaking wonder of the Great Barrier Reef, to the cold, sterile fish tank, the animation is top notch and truly state of the art. The water, which has always been the bane of animation, is picture perfect, and the animators have captured the rolling but constant ocean and the light refractions perfectly. But animation itself doesn’t make a film. Finding Nemo’s strongest aspect is it’s warm, witty, heartfelt, and funny story of a father’s quest to reclaim his son. The kids will love the vibrant characters and funny situations, and so will the parents. However, the parents will be able to enjoy the film on a level far more than the kids will. The story is about losing a child, and the desperate quest to be reunited, which will hit the parent right in the gut. This is the story’s dark side, which has, thankfully, not been sugar coated by the creators. Overall, lets just say Halleluja, Pixar, you’ve done it again!
Was this review helpful to you?
|Walt Would Approve,
Recently, I saw Albert Brooks on Late Night with David Letterman, talking about Finding Nemo. Brooks, who stars as the voice of Marlon, the daddy fish, had taken his son (who, I believe was about five years old, the equivalent human age of Nemo), to the premiere. After about five minutes, Brooks said his son leaned over to him, and quietly said, the way a grownup might, “I cannot watch this movie,” and walked out. Late in the movie, the son returned, having obviously been crying. Leaning over, Brooks assured his son, “You are not Nemo.”
Such is the power of this fish story about father and son clownfish who become separated, and must struggle to find their way back to each other. Marlon is a loving but neurotic and overprotective father; Nemo is a frustrated young fish who wants to be independent and see the world, and resents his father for preventing him from doing so. We see an ocean (read: the world) that is a terrible, heartless, and yet joyous place that we frail fish must confront, as best we can, because there’s no alternative.
The animation was done by the wonderful folks from Pixar, who are the closest thing to the reincarnation of Walt Disney. There is simply no comparison between the animation of the typical, visually flat, politically correct, contemporary animated movie (many of which are produced by Walt Disney Pictures!) and Nemo. In Nemo, the ocean floor looks like the ocean. And the characters are all … characters. They are all physically distinctive, wonderfully written, and performed by gifted actors who – if you’ll pardon the cliché – will alternately make you laugh and cry. Of particular note are Barry Humphries as Bruce the Shark, Geoffrey Rush as Nigel the Pelican, Willem Dafoe as Gill, Allison Janney as Peach, and of course, young Alexander Gould as Nemo. Ellen Degeneres, in particular, steals every scene she’s in, as Dory, a gregarious fish whose memory leaks like a sieve. But this is Albert Brooks’ movie. The Academy should give this man a special Oscar for the most moving voice work my wife and I have ever heard.
Thomas Newman, of the musical Newman clan (Alfred, Lionel, Randy) has produced a score that is subtle and unobtrusive much of the time, but at dramatic moments takes over, and is more impressive, with repeated viewings. He deserves his fifth Oscar nomination for Nemo.
Andrew Stanton’s (Toy Story, Monsters, Inc.) screenplay, written with Bob Peterson and David Reynolds, brims with intelligence and wit (e.g., in an AA-style group of recovering – and frequently lapsing – sharks, the members intone, “I am a nice shark, not an eating machine…. Fish are friends, not food”), and Stanton’s direction does not waste a scene. Every moment in Nemo will either charm you or move you. In fact, as my wife remarked, for all of its many comic scenes, this is one of the most moving movies you’ll ever see. We’ve already seen it several times with our three-and-a-half-year-old son, who loves it, and yet with each new viewing, we notice things we’d previously missed.
Though I wish Nemo would win all of the big Oscars (Best Picture, Director, Screenplay), I doubt Academy voters will choose it over its live-action competition. And yet, I will be very surprised, if a better picture — live action or animated — is released this year. Finding Nemo is truly a find.
Originally published in The Critical Critic, October 17, 2003.
Was this review helpful to you?
|The Coolest Movie I have Ever Seen.,
YOU MUST SEE THIS MOVIE.
There. Now that I’ve said that, I should tell you that this is NOT solely a childrens’ movie, but will be enjoyed as much (if not more) by adults. The cleverness of Pixar will never cease to amaze me. Only they could take a concept like a full-length movie about fish and make it totally believable. This film succeeds n being very, very funny. Heck, I’m 16 and saw it in the theater with only my mother. The two of us were laughing hysterically throughout the entire thing!
There’s alot of sadness and emotion in this movie and some absolutely terrific voice acting–the voice cast is top-notch. There are some touching moments and subtle messages to be heard by all, not just kids. I look forward with anticipation to the DVD release of this wonderful movie. The suspense never lets up; encounters with jellyfish, a whale, and a deep-sea lanturn fish make every moment exciting.
As we know, every Disney/Pixar film is associated with its own special “short.” Well, this one is the best yet, and the short film sets you up for the great feelings you’ll have while seeing “Finding Nemo.” I won’t give away the storyline, but it involves a cute snowman, a water globe, and some tropical souvenirs that completely ready one for the overwhelming tropical-ness of the feature film.
One thing I can’t get over is how true-to-life these characters are. The attention to finding a unique species for each fish is incredible and adds a whole new, educational, dimension to the movie. There are some memorable characters in “Finding Nemo.” First and foremost is Marlin, the lovable clownfish who is an overprotective father to his adventurous son, Nemo. Then there’s Dory, the regal blue tang with the memory problem. She provides much of the comic relief but is also an immensely “real” character. Bruce is a mako shark who wants to get rid of the typical image of sharks as mindless eating machines. Crush is a 150-year-old sea turtle with a cool-surfer-dude attitude. Nigel is a helpful pelican. The whole thing takes place in the Great Barrier Reef off the coast of Australia.
And then there are the aquarium fish, who invite Nemo into their ‘club’ when he gets scooped from the sea. He goes through the initiation ceremony at Mt. Wannahockaloogee, complete with tiki statues and all. The animation is awesome. Their group includes Peach, the lookout starfish; Deb, a delusional fish who thinks her reflection is her sister; a French shrimp, a puffer fish, a yellow tang, and a royal gramma. They are led by Gill, a moorish idol who longs to return to the ocean.
This film is excellent; it deserves a sequel…
Overall this is one film that nobody should miss–parents, kids, or otherwise. I hope this review has convinced you to go get yourself a ticket to “Finding Nemo.”
Was this review helpful to you?
|Wait until Chrismas 2013,
Almost clicked the order button, but due to my love of the extended versions of the original trilogy, I decided to do a little research before I made that mistake. in doing so, I discovered that the Blue-Ray/DVD set for release on March 19th will contain only the theatrical version of the movie. Warner Bros is including a teaser trailer containing Dragon Smaug with this version in order to entice people to buy it. The extended version of ‘The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey’ will be released in time for Christmas 2013. As with the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, Warner Bros. is trying to stick it to the consumer again by hoping people will buy both versions. Sorry, WB… I can wait another nine months. In the meantime, I’ll rent a copy to satisfy my urge to see it sooner.
Was this review helpful to you?
Ignore the naysayers!,
This movie is FREAKING AMAZING!!! I was getting really worried before going to see it because of some negative reviews, but there is nothing to worry about. If you loved the Lord of the Rings movies, especially the extended editions, then you will love The Hobbit too!
A little bit about me: I grew up on the animated movies, read the books when I was in sixth grade, and have reread them several times over the years. I’m a HUGE fan, but not a “purist”, and saw each of the live action films several times in the theaters. I took a class on Tolkien in college (and knew more about the books than even the teacher lol), went to view the original manuscripts at Marquette University in Milwaukee twice, and borrowed most of the History of Middle Earth books from the library but just skimmed them. I’m pretty familiar with much of the appendices/deleted chapters/abandoned attempts at revising The Hobbit and sequelizing Lord of the Rings, etc.
I’ve been waiting for The Hobbit since 2003, and have been following the production online. When it was announced 5 months ago that Peter Jackson was splitting the story into 3 films (after already completing production on the 2-film adaptation), my heart sank. It’s not that I was opposed to turning The Hobbit into a trilogy (despite that it’s meant to be a children’s story and not an epic), but I just didn’t think there was enough story and it seemed like a cash grab that would probably destroy the pacing. But, Peter Jackson hasn’t let me down before and so I held out hope. In fact the more I heard him talk about giving the dwarves a bit more character development and backstory and adding in all the stuff about the White Council, I began to look forward to it.
When a couple weeks ago reviews starting coming in saying that, as I had first feared, the movie dragged and the pacing was terrible, I prepared myself for disappointment. Even though hardcore fans on messageboards like theonering.net who had seen the movie early kept saying it was terrific, the negative reviews from professional critics kept coming in. The movie is “bloated” and “dull” and “misses the point”, they said. And so I was VERY nervous going to see the movie this afternoon.
I’m pleased to say that not only is the movie incredible, but it’s on par with the Lord of the Rings movies. I haven’t felt this way about a movie since Fellowship of the Ring 10 years ago. I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it all night, and I can’t wait till I can go see it again. I sat in the theater for nearly three hours with the biggest grin on my face the entire time. The movie didn’t feel bloated or stretched thin to me. I was worried that there would be all these scenes that went on too long or belonged on the cutting room floor, but I can’t think of anything I would have left out. It was like watching the book acted out on the screen in front of me with really great acting, music, and production values.
The cinematography has really improved in the last 10 years! Wow this movie is beautifully shot! Howard Shore’s music is once again great, though there are some little deletions and changes from the Original Soundtrack — the only one that really bugged me though was the use of the Nazgul theme over Thorin fighting Azog. There was better music there in the Original Soundtrack and changing it was a horrible decision.
I love the added stuff with the White Council/Necromancer. It’s all there in Tolkien’s appendices and in “Unfinished Tales”, and (blasphemy for saying so) depending on how this continues to play out over the next two movies I may end up liking this even better than the book! Either the next film or the one after that will have the Battle of Dol Goldur and, from what I’ve heard, we will see Gandalf, Saruman, Radagast, and Galadriel battling werewolves and giant spiders as they try to drive out the Necromancer. I can just imagine how awesome that will be if Peter Jackson pulls it off!
And, yes, this felt to me like a complete movie. One of the reasons I originally hated the idea of a trilogy was I expected to feel short changed by only seeing a small fraction of the story and then having to wait another year. But I felt like there was plenty of story and they got into plenty of adventures.
My only nitpicks are few: I liked the design of the Great Goblin but I thought he acted way too cartoony. My other is there were a couple times where Bilbo and the dwarves fell from a height of like 500 feet and just got back up. They would have been killed. I also thought the character Azog was fine, but why did he have to be all CGI? Why couldn’t it have been an actor in makeup like Lurtz in Fellowship of the Ring? Those are really my only nitpicks though.
As I sat in the theater I had a feeling like this is one of the best filmgoing experiences I’ve ever had. I had the same feeling watching Lord of the Rings. As someone who…
Read more
Was this review helpful to you?
GREAT CHARACTER DEPTH added to BEAUTIFUL CINEMATOGRAPHY,
Are you ready to return to middle-earth? Why wouldn’t you be? Peter Jackson, with the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy, brought us to a place that many thought wasn’t possible except in the written form. A product of many of our childhoods, J.R.R. Tolkien constructed an elaborate world of wizards, trolls, elves, dwarves, humans and most importantly Hobbits. It is an elaborately detailed world of maps, homelands, stories and adventures. It couldn’t possibly be realized anywhere close to what J.R.R. Tolkien’s imagination did. Yet, Jackson pulled it off better than anyone could have hoped. Now, he’s trying again.
“The Hobbit” is a step backward into the history of middle-earth. It is quite simply the adventure that Bilbo Baggins takes that leads to him writing his book, “There and back again”. Peter Jackson is trying to do the unthinkable with this trilogy, duplicate the magic he pulled off before. Much can be told from this first installment and whether or not the magic is still there.
The movie, filmed at twice frame-speed as traditional film (48 frames) has many geeks talking about how it will look too real. Ultimately, at 48 frames, it could look as crisp and real as a soap opera. Well, first of all, with a film like this, it takes a lot of guts to attempt such a thing; a movie with such obvious special effects and makeup. Yet, the opposite could also be achieved; a level of escapism and realism that not only delivers a quality movie experience, but also sucks you into a world that you don’t want to leave.
Peter Jackson has learned a few things from his first trilogy and you can see it in “The Hobbit”. This world is even more realized. The characters are more fleshed out. Richard Armitage’s depiction of Thorin is full of heart and passion. The faithfulness to the book itself is even more realized. More importantly, the journey is even more colorful and creative.
“The Hobbit” is a lot of the same. It’s another journey full of adventure and trolls, dwarves and orcs, but again, it is a quality journey. The escapism you feel in this film is like nothing I’ve ever felt before. When it was time to go, at the end of the film, I didn’t want to go yet. I was there, I was in middle-earth, ready to take the journey ahead with Bilbo, Gandolff and the band of Dwarves. I didn’t care about length or how long I had been sitting there, I was invested. That, is really all any movie can do.
Was this review helpful to you?
